Can You Get Away With a Crime Using the ‘Sleepwalking Defense’?

The idea of committing a crime while asleep sounds like something out of a movie, but in rare cases, defendants have successfully argued that they were not conscious of their actions. The sleepwalking defense has been used in courtrooms worldwide to prove that an individual was not responsible for their crimes due to an involuntary state. But can you really get away with a crime by claiming you were asleep? This article explores real-life cases where this defense was used, the legal challenges it presents, and whether science backs up such claims.

Sleepwalking, or somnambulism, is a recognized sleep disorder in which a person engages in complex behaviors while remaining unconscious. However, proving that someone was sleepwalking during a violent act is an immense legal hurdle. Let’s dive into some shocking cases, expert opinions, and the scientific evidence behind this unusual legal defense.

---

The Science Behind Sleepwalking and Crime

Sleepwalking is classified as a parasomnia, a sleep disorder that causes involuntary movements or actions during non-REM sleep. While most cases involve harmless activities like walking or talking, some rare instances have led to violent acts, including homicide. Scientists have identified triggers such as sleep deprivation, stress, and genetic factors that can contribute to sleepwalking episodes.

Neurologists studying the sleepwalking defense argue that the brain functions differently in this state. The individual may exhibit complex behaviors but lacks self-awareness and memory formation. This has been confirmed in sleep studies using EEG scans, which show abnormal brain activity in sleepwalkers. However, proving that a person was sleepwalking at the exact moment of a crime is another challenge altogether.

The legal system requires compelling medical evidence to accept the defense, but courts often remain skeptical. Many judges and prosecutors worry about false claims, as allowing such a defense could set a dangerous precedent. Despite this skepticism, there have been cases where the sleepwalking defense resulted in acquittals.

---

Real Cases of Sleepwalking Murders

The Kenneth Parks Case (Canada, 1987)

One of the most famous sleepwalking defense cases involved Kenneth Parks, a Canadian man who drove 14 miles to his in-laws’ house, attacked his mother-in-law with a tire iron, and then turned himself in to the police. He had no known motive and was later diagnosed with a severe sleep disorder.

Medical experts testified that he was in a sleepwalking state and incapable of conscious decision-making. The court ultimately acquitted him of murder, accepting that he had no intent to kill. This case set a legal precedent and proved that the sleepwalking defense could be successful under the right conditions.

The Scott Falater Case (USA, 1997)

In contrast to Parks, Scott Falater’s case had a different outcome. He was accused of stabbing his wife 44 times and then hiding the evidence. He claimed he had no recollection of the event and that he must have been sleepwalking.

However, the prosecution pointed out his deliberate actions, such as cleaning up the crime scene, which suggested intent. Unlike Parks, Falater was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. This case demonstrated that the sleepwalking defense is not a guaranteed escape from justice.

The Brian Thomas Case (UK, 2008)

Brian Thomas strangled his wife in his sleep, believing he was defending her from an intruder. He had a history of sleep disorders, and medical experts confirmed that he suffered from night terrors. Unlike Falater, Thomas showed no attempt to cover up the crime, reinforcing the argument that he was unaware of his actions.

The court accepted the sleepwalking defense, and he was acquitted of murder. This case highlights the importance of medical history and expert testimony in determining whether the defense is legitimate.

---

Legal Challenges of the Sleepwalking Defense

Proving Lack of Intent

In criminal law, intent is a crucial element in determining guilt. The sleepwalking defense hinges on proving that the accused had no intent to commit a crime. Prosecutors often counter this by showing evidence of planning or deliberate action, which can undermine the defense.

Courts typically rely on medical experts to verify whether the defendant has a history of sleep disorders. Without documented evidence, it becomes nearly impossible to prove that sleepwalking was the cause of the crime. This is why very few people successfully use this defense.

Public Skepticism and Legal Precedents

Many people are skeptical of the sleepwalking defense, believing it could be an easy way to avoid punishment. As a result, courts are extremely cautious when considering such claims. Judges often reference past cases, like the Kenneth Parks and Scott Falater trials, to assess the likelihood of the defense being valid.

Another major concern is setting a legal precedent. If the courts accepted the sleepwalking defense too easily, it could open the door for false claims, making it harder to prosecute real criminals. This is why each case undergoes rigorous scrutiny before a verdict is reached.

The Role of Sleep Experts in Court

Since sleepwalking is difficult to prove, sleep specialists play a key role in the courtroom. Using EEG studies, medical history, and expert testimonies, these specialists analyze whether a defendant had a genuine sleep disorder. In many cases, their findings can make or break a defendant’s case.

For instance, in the Brian Thomas trial, sleep experts demonstrated that he had a long history of night terrors, strengthening his defense. However, in Scott Falater’s case, experts could not rule out conscious intent, leading to his conviction. This highlights the importance of expert testimony in cases involving the sleepwalking defense.

---

Could You Use the Sleepwalking Defense?

Medical Evidence is Crucial

If someone attempts to use the sleepwalking defense, they must provide strong medical evidence. A history of sleep disorders, past episodes of parasomnia, and documented medical records can support the claim. Without this, courts are unlikely to take the defense seriously.

Behavior During and After the Crime Matters

Courts closely examine a defendant’s behavior before and after the crime. If the actions appear premeditated, such as hiding a weapon or fleeing the scene, it weakens the defense. A genuine sleepwalking episode often involves random, erratic behavior, rather than calculated actions.

The Rarity of a Successful Defense

The sleepwalking defense is rarely successful due to the difficulty in proving unconsciousness at the time of the crime. Only a handful of cases have resulted in acquittals, while most defendants face conviction due to lack of sufficient medical evidence.

---

Conclusion

While the sleepwalking defense has helped some defendants avoid prison, it is far from a foolproof legal strategy. Courts demand overwhelming medical evidence, credible expert testimony, and a lack of intent to even consider the possibility. Cases like Kenneth Parks and Brian Thomas show that it can work in rare instances, while Scott Falater’s conviction proves that not all claims hold up under scrutiny.

For anyone considering using the sleepwalking defense, the reality is that proving unconsciousness beyond a reasonable doubt is extremely difficult. However, ongoing research into sleep disorders and criminal behavior may provide new insights in the future. Until then, this legal defense remains one of the rarest and most controversial strategies in criminal law.